10-Day Global Surgical Procedures with Comparable Work RVU’s to ECTR (6.39)

In our effort to compare and contrast different procedures I analyzed 10-day global procedures. These are generally considered “office” procedures.

CPTDescriptionGlobalNON FAC PE RVUFAC PE RVUWORK RVUMALPRTOT NON FAC RVUTOT RVUTOT FAC RVU
11646Exc f/e/e/n/l mal+mrg >4 cm107.44.116.260.9114.5714.5711.28
55706Prostate saturation sampling10 3.86.280.67  10.75
36566Insert tunneled cv cath10124.732.956.291.21132.23132.2310.45
42720Drainage of throat abscess105.793.996.310.8512.9512.9511.15
49324Lap insert tunnel ip cath10 3.526.321.5  11.34
58356Endometrial cryoablation1044.622.836.411.0152.0452.0410.25
50592Perc rf ablate renal tumor1084.082.816.550.5691.1991.199.92
38510Biopsy/removal lymph nodes107.114.16.741.2515.115.112.09
49325Lap revision perm ip cath10 3.656.821.63  12.1
49428Ligation of shunt10 4.036.871.68  12.58
63650Implant neuroelectrodes1046.264.017.150.7754.1854.1811.93

The list above includes 10-day global procedures with a Work RVU close to 6.93 similar to ECTR (29848). Most have a Site of Service Differential. Four do not so it cannot be said that all 10-day global procedures are “office” procedures. I found that surprising. My takeaway is that the Facility versus Non-Facility PE Site of Service Differential is not exactly proportional to the global days (90 versus 10). They are related but there are exceptions.

These would be considered “facility-only”. It’s likely that they are generally performed in the office; I don’t know if an insurance company would deny them for POS=11 but there is no NON-FAC PE reimbursement.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.